Opens in a new tab

Textile greenwashing: when sustainability is only a façade

The term greenwashing has become widely used, but in the textile industry it carries particular weight.
Behind slogans, labels and marketing claims, there are often opaque practices that undermine consumer trust and the future of authentic sustainability.

What is greenwashing

    • Greenwashing occurs when a company pretends to be environmentally responsible in order to increase sales.
      Here’s how it typically works:
      the company invests more in “green” advertising than in actual environmental action. It uses images of nature, green colours and words like “eco-friendly” or “sustainable”, while continuing to pollute or exploit resources as before.

    • The term comes from “green” and “whitewashing”, referring to the act of disguising something as eco-friendly when it is not.

    In the textile sector, it may appear as:

    • vague or unverifiable claims;
    • labels such as “eco”, “green” or “responsible” with no supporting data;
    • emphasising a minor improvement (e.g. packaging, pre-consumer CO₂) while ignoring the rest of the production chain.

    The result is a green image that does not reflect any real, structural change.

    How greenwashing appears in the textile sector

    The most common examples include:

    • using a marginal percentage of recycled fibres but presenting it as a total transformation;
    • lack of supply-chain traceability;
    • absence of recognised certifications (GOTS, OEKO-TEX, Bluesign, etc.);
    • communication focused on secondary details rather than on the overall production model.

    Often, companies improve a single stage of production and present it as evidence of full commitment.
    But sustainability is a systemic process — not a branding strategy.

    Why greenwashing is a systemic problem

    Greenwashing in the textile industry affects more than consumers — it harms companies that are genuinely working towards real sustainability.
    It:

    creates confusion and mistrust;

    discourages truly sustainable practices;

    penalises transparent companies;

    misleads consumers into believing they are making informed choices.

    The lack of shared standards and clear oversight makes it even easier to spread ambiguous messages, especially across digital channels.

    How to recognize it: a guide for companies and consumers

    Companies should make information available clearly and transparently.
    Consumers cannot be expected to carry out investigations — sustainability must also be built through accessible, verifiable communication.

    To communicate authentic sustainability, companies should:

    provide data, certifications and third-party audits

    avoid vague, generic or unsupported claims

    give visibility to the entire life cycle of products

    clearly explain whether and how a material can be regenerated

    Beyond Communication, Towards Consistency

    Greenwashing is not just a communication issue — it is a cultural barrier to ecological transition.

    To overcome it, companies must adopt a model based on consistency, transparency and genuinely sustainable design, not just sustainability “on paper”.

    Sources & references